The Taboo Fact about Openness in Anglo/Oriental Cultures


By Winston Wu (Founder of

I’ve usually wondered about something:

Why is it that on Tv set and in motion pictures, persons are so open, pleasant, sociable, communicative, effortlessly invite you into their cliques, take you out for exciting and introduce you to many others? They act so warm, passionate, entire of everyday living and sensation, and are easy to get associated with. And in romance/drama movies of previous (less so these days) persons ended up so passionate and entire of sensation in their eyes and expression, as even though they ended up completely knowledgeable and acutely aware.

But in authentic everyday living, persons are typically uptight, closed, cliquish, paranoid, anti-social exterior their clique, hard to fulfill, you should not converse to you except if its small business linked, and mainly dismiss you and expect you to intellect your individual small business whilst they intellect theirs. Individuals are in a bubble and there is an “ice barrier” in between strangers. They look like zombies/automatons who are totally unaware and oblivious to many others all-around them, as even though they ended up not completely acutely aware. They are usually in a hurry to get by means of their day-to-day schedule. They look totally uninterested and unconcerned with human relationship. And if you are not like that too, you adhere out like a sore thumb, like you are in a kind of Twilight Zone – in a unique truth from everybody else!

Why is there this sort of a Substantial distinction that no 1 ever talks about?! It truly is so strange, like the Twilight Zone!

My buddy and cultural advisor, a previous US immigrant, created the identical observation in my discussion board: board/viewtopic.php?t=8855

“I believe typically, the biggest society shock that persons practical experience in the US is not in between their country and the US but in between what they imagined the US would be and what it truly is. Guides and motion pictures about The united states make the location seem very cost-free and remarkable and happening and the persons are so interesting and emotional. There is intercourse and exciting and romance heading on. When they arrive, the location appears to be very conservative and the persons seem robotic and peaceful. Intercourse is subdued and tricky to occur by. The persons are not open at all, they glimpse closed and mistrustful. Most people is just operating and looking fatigued and apathetic. Chatting to strangers is taboo. There are 1000’s of very little regulations and guidelines and social mores that look as dogmatic and demanding as all those in a Muslim modern society. And each individual time you are at danger of breaking nevertheless an additional legislation and struggling with very dire repercussions. That is the biggest society shock of all.”

This is so very obvious, nevertheless no 1 talks about it. To do so would make you glimpse like a loser, so no 1 dares to. It truly is like an “Emperor’s New Apparel” syndrome. Both that, or persons you should not see it due to the cognitive dissonance of their programming.

There is also an unspoken social legislation that states that any place you go, you Must say that persons are very pleasant and wonderful, or you say nothing at all. Or you can blame on your own. But you are NOT allowed to say that persons are anti-social. That is a big taboo and No-No.

But the real truth is that in Anglo international locations (e.g. Usa, Canada) and Oriental East Asian cultures (e.g. Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, and so on.) only middle aged persons and very little youngsters are open and casually converse with any one who is pleasant. But persons in in between are a unique breed (especially women). They are closed, uptight, cliquish, paranoid and go about minding their individual small business and expect many others to do the identical. You have to play difficult challenging intellect video games to attempt to get into their cliques, and then Maybe you will get in.

This distinction in between previous persons, children and youthful adults (especially women) is as obvious as 2+2=4 in Anglo and Oriental cultures, and is the norm and effortlessly demonstratable. However NO 1 talks about it besides me for some rationale. Why?! It truly is as if it ended up “hidden in simple sight” from most people, or the real truth is forbidden!

In truth, Anglo and Oriental cultures are workaholic, robotic, cliquish, non-social, slave cultures developed purely for small business and efficiency. They are devoid of enthusiasm, soul and romance. All the things in these cultures is geared for small business, not enthusiasm, human relationship, or expression. (even though The united states has fake variations of these in its Hollywood society) Individuals are addressed and groomed as economic sources and defined by their economic functions (e.g. staff, tax payers, customers, and so on). They reside extremely materialistic and segregated way of living devoid of human relationship.

As a outcome, they develop into equipment, rigid and repressed, devoid of romance and enthusiasm. The regimented socializing that does take location in this sort of cultures is normally fake, synthetic, uptight, pretentious and a cliche somewhat than a certainly flowing interactive practical experience.

But you would not detect all this if you have only used time in Anglo/Oriental cultures for you would have nothing to compare them to. You would have to reside in cultures that are the opposite to certainly know the distinction.

On the other hand, in international locations that are poorer with substantial peasant classes or have additional open and passionate cultures (e.g. Latin The united states, Russia, Ukraine, Spain, Holland, Philippines, and so on.), meeting persons takes place as effortlessly as blowing in the wind! Virtually! The distinction is astounding, like a BILLION %, but 1 has to practical experience it firsthand to certainly see it. Why is there this sort of a big distinction?

In social environments, there is an unspoken social legislation that states you are allowed to say statements this sort of as the following:

1) Anyone or most persons are so pleasant and wonderful! (which most vacation web-sites and vacation packages say about persons everywhere you go)
2) I am very fast paced with function and have no time to fulfill persons.
3) I deficiency social skills and am not very outgoing.

Or you say nothing at all. As a result you are only allowed to praise the bulk or blame on your own. These are the “norms” and boundaries of what you can and can not say, and as you develop up, you understand them progressively. Fact is not the greatest value in modern society, and the stating “Honesty is the finest coverage” is not adopted. Thus, to say something like the following would be a big taboo:

“I have problems meeting persons here. I am very open and pleasant, but persons here are so closed, caught up, anti-social, cliquish, non-inclusive, and you should not want to fulfill me. They you should not converse to strangers except if it is small business-linked. They just intellect their individual small business and expect me to do the identical. So I find it tricky to fulfill persons here.”

No make a difference how Legitimate and justified it is, you are NOT Permitted to say that! It truly is like real truth by itself has develop into a taboo, which is the indication of a sick modern society.

In simple fact, in any society, it is taboo to say that the persons there are anti-social, even if it is accurate. As a result, you will not find this sort of statements in any reserve in the major general public library or in any information publications. It is totally forbidden, no make a difference how accurate or justified.

In simple fact, if you say the unacceptable assertion over, not only is it taboo and politically incorrect, but it is freakish and disturbing to persons mainly because it VIOLATES their paradigm of truth, which retains the bogus assumption and fallacy that:

1) The bulk of persons are ideal, usual, sane, pleasant and sociable.
2) Misfits and persons who you should not observe the herd are nuts, crazy and unusual. They are the problem and to blame for any incompatibility with many others.

However, quite a few terrific thinkers and intellectuals with deep insight, from ages in the past to new situations, have observed by means of this fallacy, and realized that the reverse was accurate. Below are some rates from them:

“The item in everyday living is not to be on the facet of the bulk, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the crazy.” – Marcus Aurelius, Roman Emperor

“It is no evaluate of health and fitness to be perfectly adjusted to a profoundly sick modern society.” – Jiddu Krishnamurti

“The adult men the American general public admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars the adult men they detest most violently are all those who attempt to notify them the real truth.” – H. L. Mencken

“Even if you are a minority of 1, the real truth is the real truth.” – Gandhi

“Madness in folks is something rare – but in groups, functions, nations and epochs, it is the rule.” – Frederich Nietzsche

“Ninety-nine p.c of the persons in the planet are fools, and the rest of us are in terrific danger of contagion.” – Thornton Wilder

“Anytime persons concur with me I usually feel I ought to be wrong.” — Oscar Wilde

“The specific has usually had to struggle to continue to keep from currently being confused by the tribe. If you attempt it, you will be lonely usually, and often frightened. But no rate is too high to pay out for the privilege of possessing on your own.” – Frederich Nietzsche

“Men have been taught that it is a virtue to concur with many others. But the creator is the guy who disagrees. Men have been taught that it is a virtue to swim with the existing. But the creator is the guy who goes in opposition to the existing. Men have been taught that it is a virtue to stand alongside one another. But the creator is the guy who stands alone.” – Ayn Rand

“Honesty is this sort of a lonely term. Anyone is so untrue…” – Billy Joel, in his hit tune “Honesty”

“The sick specific finds himself at home with all other in the same way sick folks. The full society is geared to this form of pathology. The outcome is that the typical specific does not practical experience the separateness and isolation the completely schizophrenic individual feels. He feels at ease between all those who go through from the identical deformation in simple fact, it is the completely sane individual who feels isolated in the crazy modern society — and he may possibly go through so significantly from the incapacity to connect that it is he who may possibly develop into psychotic.” – Eric Fromm (The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness)

(Fromm’s assertion over potentially explains why the bulk do not see the obvious social realities I described.)

This parable illustrates the real truth that Fromm described very perfectly:

“The parable of the poisoned perfectly

There was as soon as a sensible king who dominated in excess of a broad city. He was feared for his may and loved for his wisdom. Now in the coronary heart of the city, there was a perfectly whose waters ended up pure and crystalline from which the king and all the inhabitants drank. When all ended up asleep, an enemy entered the city and poured 7 drops of a bizarre liquid into the perfectly. And he mentioned that henceforth all who drink this water shall develop into mad.

All the persons drank of the water, but not the king. And the persons began to say, “The king is mad and has misplaced his rationale. Appear how surprisingly he behaves. We can not be dominated by a madman, so he ought to be dethroned.”

The king grew very fearful, for his subjects ended up preparing to increase in opposition to him. So 1 evening, he ordered a golden goblet to be filled from the perfectly, and he drank deeply. The subsequent working day, there was terrific rejoicing between the persons, for their beloved king had lastly regained his rationale.”

As a result it is unhappy and no speculate that we reside in an upside down planet, as Michael Ellner describes in this profound assertion:

“Just glimpse at us. All the things is backwards. All the things is upside down. Medical professionals wipe out health and fitness, lawyers wipe out justice, universities wipe out understanding, governments wipe out flexibility, the main media wipe out facts, and faith destroys spirituality.”

What all this suggests is that if you are even knowledgeable of the social realities described over, you will have the hardest time breaking into cliques in Anglo/Oriental international locations, mainly because cliques and groups in prosperous cultures are entire of fakeness and conformity, and 1 has to be on a comparable vibration with the social clique to even have a opportunity at breaking in (apart from taking part in the challenging social video games too). This suggests that if you are on a “real truth vibration” and see matters the way they are, you will not be suitable with most cliques, hence if you realize the truth over, you are currently a misfit. This is the unhappy truth. Also, persons who usually notify the real truth have a tendency to have several buddies and is not going to in good shape into substantial cliques.

So the question we ought to question is: What is the value and rate of real truth, flexibility and liberation of intellect? And is the rate value it?

Most persons even though, choose the simple advantages of conformity, somewhat than the real truth or the value of possessing oneself.

For additional freethinking and real truth articles or blog posts: or blog posts.php

Supply by Winston Wu

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.